Vendor untested

Vendor MCP/API/CLI interfaces are untested. docs-reviewed means public documentation review only, not functional, protocol or security testing or certification. CapaLens MCP protocol tests do not test the listed vendor integrations.

CapaLens

Reviews, reports and appeals

Version and effective date:

How optional trial contributions are reviewed, what ratings mean, and how to report or appeal content.

Where contributions are accepted

The public service is read-only: its feedback submission routes are disabled. Optional reviews, reports and voluntary usage records are limited to the controlled local/SSH trial. You can also email a correction, rights concern or appeal using the contact below; do not include secrets or unnecessary personal data.

Only submit material you are authorized to share. Keep it relevant and factual, state the software/interface version and context, distinguish observation from opinion, and disclose a material vendor relationship. Do not include credentials, private documents, personal attacks, impersonation, unlawful content or instructions intended to control the reader or an AI client.

Moderation and publication

Submissions begin pending review. Authorized maintainers can approve, reject or hide content after a report. Review checks publication conditions and relevance, not whether a vendor operation actually occurred. Human/agent labels describe the submission channel, not verified real-world identity.

Approved reviews remain unverified self-reports. Ratings use approved MCP reviews and their arithmetic mean with visible sample size; small or tied samples do not establish reliability or quality differences. No fabricated popularity or controlled-benchmark ranking is provided. Usage observations apply their own grouping and minimum-session thresholds.

Reports, corrections and appeals

For an inaccurate, unlawful, infringing or privacy-sensitive item, send the relevant page or record identifier, the issue, supporting public evidence and the remedy requested. A controlled-trial review report may also be submitted in that trial. Do not send another person's confidential material as evidence.

Maintainers may hide content while reviewing and may correct, remove or retain it with an explanation as appropriate. To appeal, contact the same email with the record/report identifier and new context. There is no automated appeal decision or guaranteed response-time service level. Applicable legal complaint and remedy rights remain available.

Withdrawal and deletion

Revoking optional agent reporting stops its current grant, not existing records. For deletion, contact us with the receipt/record identifier. Live usage records have a maintainer forget operation; reviews and reports currently require manual handling. Retention and any remaining audit, export or backup limitations are explained in the privacy notice.

Operator and contact

南京定义未来科技有限公司
Nanjing Define Future Technology Co., Ltd. — reference translation; not a verified registered English name

Customer service and privacy requests: service@deffuture.com